Climate geoengineering is a set of techniques and technologies designed to intentionally modify the Earth’s climate in order to mitigate the effects of climate challenges. It is not a conspiracy theory. It is a legitimate area of research, exploring methods for intentionally altering the Earth’s climate to mitigate the effects of climate change. These methods are studied by scientists and discussed openly and transparently.

Different approaches to climate geoengineering

There are several approaches to climate geoengineering that are worth knowing about: (i) Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is a geoengineering method that aims to reduce global warming by reducing the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface. It comprises several methods. The first is stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), which involves injecting reflective particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect some of the sun’s radiation directly back into space. This mimics the effect of large volcanic eruptions, which can temporarily cool the planet. The second method is marine cloud brightening (MCB), which involves using sea salt to stimulate the formation of clouds over the oceans, thereby increasing their reflectivity and reducing the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface.

(ii) Geoengineering through carbon dioxide (CO2) removal, also known as Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) or Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), is a geoengineering technique aimed at reducing CO2 levels in the atmosphere to mitigate climate change. CO2 is captured at source, such as factories, power stations or even directly from the air using various methods, such as chemisorption, absorption or cryogenics. It is then transported, usually by pipeline, to a storage site where it is injected and finally stored in deep geological formations, such as saline aquifers or depleted oil and gas reservoirs, where it remains permanently trapped.

(iii) Cloud modification, which is a set of techniques for modifying the properties of clouds, for example by increasing their reflectivity to reflect more sunlight back into space. The best-known technique is cloud seeding. This involves introducing substances such as silver iodide or salt into clouds to provoke precipitation (rain or snow) or to increase the amount of precipitation produced by a cloud. Cloud seeding can be used for a variety of reasons, such as increasing water reserves, reducing the risk of drought, or even mitigating hailstorms. It is one of the methods of managing solar radiation and modifying precipitation, with the aim of influencing the climate locally or regionally.

Chemtrails’ or the spraying of chemicals into the atmosphere

Chemtrails are not geo-engineering. This is a more or less widespread theory according to which chemical substances are deliberately dispersed in the atmosphere by aircraft for obscure reasons, such as climate modification, population control or other sinister objectives. This theory is widely rejected by the scientific community, which maintains that the white streaks visible in the sky are simply contrails formed by water vapour emitted by aircraft engines at high altitude.

Chemtrails form when water vapour from aircraft exhaust condenses and freezes into ice crystals due to the low temperatures at altitude. There is no credible scientific evidence to support the existence of chemtrails. However, proponents of this theory claim that an additive is added to jet fuel without the knowledge of flight crews or even airlines. The aim is to poison the air, water and food of populations as part of the globalist depopulation project. Among other things, it would modify the composition of the air by loading it with metallic particles, making it much more conductive and thus enabling better diffusion of waves and other signals as part of a transhumanist project for the Internet of bodies and widespread surveillance of populations,  also called The Internet of Bodies (IoB).

The Internet of Bodies (IoB) is a transhumanist initiative that aims to integrate advanced technological devices directly into the human body to enhance its capabilities and extend life. Devices such as heart rate monitors, sleep trackers and brain implants are used to collect health data in real time. The data collected is used to create personalised treatment plans, offering tailored healthcare. This approach involves using technologies to modify and enhance human biological functions. To this advanced project, the Internet of Things (IoT) must be associated, which is a connection of physical objects to the internet so that they can collect and exchange data. These objects can be household appliances, vehicles, industrial equipment, etc. Both concepts use advanced technologies to collect and analyze data, but the Internet of Bodies focuses specifically on technologies implanted in or worn by humans. In summary, although IoT and IoB use advanced technologies to collect and analyze data, they are not focused on modifying or controlling climatic conditions, as is the case with geoengineering.

Ethical, environmental and governance issues

Geoengineering raises ethical, environmental and governance issues, and its implementation is the subject of much debate. Some people see geoengineering as a potential solution to climate change, while others warn of unforeseen risks and side-effects. These ethical issues are at the heart of debates about the feasibility and responsibility of geoengineering as a solution to climate challenges.

The ethical concerns that arise in relation to geoengineering relate to (i) equity and justice (The benefits and risks of geoengineering are not evenly distributed across the world. Developing countries may suffer the negative consequences without reaping the benefits); (ii) Consent and participation (It is crucial to ensure that all stakeholders, including local communities and governments, are informed and consent to geoengineering projects); (iiI) Safety and predictability(Geoengineering technologies are still new and their long-term impact on the environment and human health is uncertain. It is essential to understand and minimise potential risks).

In terms of Governance and Regulation, the establishment of adequate regulatory frameworks to oversee and control geoengineering projects is necessary to avoid abuses and ensure transparency. As for environmental issues, these relate to impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity, to ensure that geoengineering projects do not cause more harm than good.

The Internet of Bodies which integrates advanced technological devices into the human body and represents a revolution in health and technology, also raises major ethical questions and technical challenges. Including (i) privacy and data confidentiality (IoB devices collect sensitive data on the health and activities of individuals. It is essential to ensure that this data is protected against cyber-attacks and potential misuse); (ii) informed consent (Individuals must be fully informed of the risks, benefits and implications of using IoB devices, so that they can give their informed consent); (iii) equity and access (Access to IoT technologies could be unequal, creating disparities between those who can afford these technologies and those who cannot); (iv) autonomy and control (The integration of technological devices into the human body raises questions about the autonomy of individuals and the control they have over their own bodies and data); (v) impact on human identity (Increasing human capabilities through technology could change the perception of what it means to be human, raising questions about human identity and dignity); (vi) safety and health risks (IoB devices must be rigorously tested to ensure that they do not pose health risks to users).

Regulations and restrictions

Whatever the case, it is important for aircrew and politicians to look into climate geoengineering and chemtrails. Despite the lack of scientific evidence, theories about chemtrails persist and are influencing discussions about geoengineering.

In the United States, these issues are no longer taboo. Discussions are under way and are the subject of passionate debate. There is growing interest in studying technologies such as injecting reflective particles into the stratosphere to reduce the sun’s heat. However, these technologies are still theoretical and require further research to assess their feasibility and impact. As far as regulations and restrictions are concerned, it should be noted that some legislative initiatives, such as the recently passed law in Tennessee, known as HB2063 and SB2691, aim to ban geoengineering technologies, often in response to chemtrail theories. This law prohibits the intentional injection of chemicals into the atmosphere to alter the climate and protect public health. It demonstrates a desire to prevent any geoengineering experiments on State territory, despite the fact that such technologies are still largely theoretical and untested on a large scale.

Discussions are also taking place at international level, with calls for a moratorium or ban on geoengineering activities, including open-air testing. These discussions highlight the ethical, regulatory and scientific challenges associated with geoengineering and chemtrails.

In France, discussions on climate geoengineering and chemtrails are also present, but they take a different form than in the United States. France, like other European countries, is increasingly interested in geoengineering as a potential solution to climate change. However, these techniques in France are still largely theoretical and are the subject of research and debate to assess their feasibility and potential impacts. As for theories about chemtrails, they are often contradicted by scientists and environmental organisations. For example, Greenpeace France has expressed doubts about chemtrail claims and called for solid scientific evidence before supporting any campaign on the subject. Furthermore, as a member of the European Union, France is involved in discussions on the regulation and governance of geoengineering technologies.

Although discussions on geoengineering and chemtrails are present in France, they focus more on scientific research and regulation than on theories. It is crucial to establish clear regulatory frameworks to oversee these technologies and prevent abuse. That’s why the Citizens Association for Monitoring, Studying and Informing on Climate and Atmospheric Intervention Programmes (ACSEIPICA ) has just called for a parliamentary commission of enquiry into geoengineering practices and the aerial spraying of chemicals on French territory, and the unprecedented health and environmental danger caused by these operations.

In Côte d’Ivoire and elsewhere in Africa, discussions on geoengineering and chemtrails are less developed. However, there is a growing interest in geoengineering technologies as a potential solution to climate challenges. Research and debates mainly focus on the potential impacts and ethical implications of these technologies.

Theories about chemtrails are also present, but they are not as widespread or influential as in other regions of the world. Efforts are more focused on raising awareness and education to clarify the differences between scientific geoengineeringand the theories.

Roselyne Kandel

What is the HAARP project ?

The HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) project is not considered to be geoengineering. HAARP is a scientific research programme designed to study the properties and behaviour of the ionosphere, the uppermost layer of the Earth’s atmosphere. The programme uses a powerful radio-frequency transmitter to create controlled disturbances in the ionosphere in order to study the physical processes that take place there. This is a scientific facility developed near Gakona, Alaska, in the United States.

Although HAARP has been the subject of conspiracy theories about the manipulation of climate and weather, the scientific community maintains that these claims are unfounded and beyond the programme’s capabilities.

Its main objective is to understand the physical and electrical properties of the ionosphere, which can affect military and civilian communications and navigation systems.

Theories claiming that HAARP manipulates climate or weather conditions are widely denied by the scientific community. Experts say that HAARP has no effect on weather systems, which occur in the lower atmosphere, well below the ionosphere.

Roselyne Kandel